Set in the dark, cold, baren wasteland of NorthEast Russia above the Arctic circle, How I Ended This Summer is a two-character drama that revolves around the repetitive, routine life at a weather station, and the phycological toll living in such a desolate place can have on a person. Pavel Danilov, played by Grigory Dobrygin, is a young college student who appears to be acting as an intern or apprentus to the weathered (no pun intended) Sergei Gulybin, played by Sergei Puskepalis. There is clearly tension between the two from the start of the movie. Young Pavel loves the heavy metal music and does not to take as much care into his work as Sergei would want. The film lacks action, special effects, even heavy dialogue, yet it is the long silence and dramatic tension between the two characters that draws the viewer in. When Pavel is taking over the radio one day when Sergei is off fishing, he overhears over that radio waves that Segei’s wife and child have died. Pavel, in fear and intimidated by his superior, fails to relay this information onto Sergei when he returns. This starts a cat and mouse relationship between the two, when Pavel is called out for messing up some of the reports. This then starts a chain reaction where Sergei starts to question how truthful young Pavel is. As the relationship between the two becomes stormy and more tense, so does the weather outside, tying the characters and their landscape together nicely. From this point on the movie turns into a phycological thriller where Pavel is trying to escape the truth and eventually, the station all together.
I had a hard time becoming engulfed in this movie for it failed to draw me in. The long pauses between dialogue, the lack of character development, and bleak landscape make for a long, slow film that needs to be seen through the end to fully grasp. Life at this weather station is very routine, with the daily activities being repeated day in and day out; the director does a good job of emphasizing this. It was also hard to get wrapped into the story because it was a two-character story, with no development of the two characters. The viewer can only make conclusion on what the see, there is no background information given at any point in the film. you do not know how long the two men have been together or how long Pavel has been up there, it is up to the viewer to make their own assumptions. Also the fact that the movie is in Russian make it hard for an english speaking viewer to know when their are undertones, hidden meanings, or sarcasm throughout the dialogue; things we would immediately pick up on in english. however I am glad that I watched this movie through because even though the last part of the film is a very anti-climactic chase, the whole movie itself sends a good message of trust and honesty.